Celebrity sexism doesn’t stop at Hollywood: The way we report on and write about female celebrities

celebrity sexism

Last year, actress Jennifer Lawrence made headlines when she wrote an essay about the gender gap in salaries for male versus female actors. Lawrence pointed out that even in this day and age, male actors earn more than their female costars.

The fact that male actors make more money than female actors, on average, may not be surprising given that there’s a gender wage gap across occupational fields. As a result, it may not seem that unusual that female actors, as immortal as they may sometimes seem, face the same wage-gap challenge that women in other industries do.

What doesn’t get as much attention, however, is a subtler form of sexism that female actors face: the way we talk to them and about them. Ever watch a red-carpet event that precedes a major awards show like the Oscars or the Emmys? If you have, did you notice anything about the questions that female actors versus male actors got asked when they were interviewed? You may have noticed that women tend to get asked about their gowns or pregnancies whereas men are more likely to get asked about their acting roles or costars.

This discrepancy in how male and female actors are interviewed doesn’t just bother feminists; it’s touched a nerve with the celebrities themselves. At the 2015 Grammys, Nicole Kidman refused to answer Ryan Seacrest when he asked her which designer she was wearing. Even more boldly, at the 2014 SAG Awards, Cate Blanchett crouched down and called out a cameraman who did a full-body pan of her dress by asking “Do you do that to the guys?”.

Some members of the media have recognized the differences in how men and women are interviewed on the red carpet and have tried to take a different approach. One journalist started a campaign called #AskHerMore to encourage reporters to ask women about more than just the designer they’re wearing. More recently, Buzzfeed made headlines when they created a video in which they asked men at the BAFTA Awards the types of questions that women typically get asked (including asking a confused Eddie Redmayne to do a twirl).

Now, it may seem easy to blame the media for treating female actors in a sexist way, but in reality, us mortals aren’t any better. Earlier this year, Grammarly analyzed the way that actors are described in movie reviews and comments. One of the things they found was that although actors Charlotte Rampling and Sylvester Stallone are about the same age, people described Rampling as “aging” but Stallone as “iconic.” People were also more likely to focus on physical appearance when describing a female versus male actor.

Given the amount of money that A-list actors make, it may be hard to feel sympathetic toward female actors. In fact, some may even go as far as to say that female actors shouldn’t complain about how they’re treated because they’ve chosen a field that’s known for privileging beauty at the expense of valuing other qualities. However, let’s imagine the impact that female actors could have if we let them talk about the things that really matter to them at a time when millions of people around the world are listening. Some may still wish to talk about their gowns, and if they make that decision on their own, there’s nothing wrong with that. Other women, however, may choose to comment on a current event or champion a social cause, thereby inspiring and motivating other people to get involved in their communities. It may sound crazy to say that we could change the world by changing the way we talk to female actors, but maybe it’s not so crazy after all.

What are your thoughts on the way people report on and write about female celebrities? Let us know by leaving a note in our comments section below.

Need to make a good impression with your marketing content, funding proposal, or admissions essay? We can help. Get an instant quote here.

Inpression Editing | Online editing, copywriting, and coaching | www.inpression.io


“The woman’s card” versus “The woman card”: Which one is it?

trump woman's card

Late last month, Donald Trump created a media firestorm when he publicly stated that Hillary Clinton has been successful in the 2016 US presidential campaign only because she’s a woman: “if Hillary Clinton were a man, I don’t think she’d get 5 percent of the vote. The only thing she’s got going is the woman’s card.”

We can assume that Trump made his comment to make Clinton seem like a weak candidate. However, where Trump saw criticism, Clinton’s campaign team saw an opportunity. They made sure that she was ready to fire back, and fire back she did: “Well, if fighting for women’s health care and paid family leave and equal pay is playing the woman card, then deal me in.”

In the days and weeks following Trump’s now famous comments, the media has spent a lot of time discussing whether Clinton’s gender matters and whether she would have a fighting chance at becoming president if she wasn’t a woman. There’s even been a lot of attention on the money that Clinton’s campaign and supporters have made from Trump’s remarks. For example, Clinton’s campaign raised $2.4 million in the three days following Trump’s comments, and Zach Wahls, a Clinton supporter, raised over $35,000 by creating a deck of cards about Clinton and other influential women.

One thing that most people aren’t talking about, however, is this: is it “the woman’s card” or “the woman card”? In his comments, Trump refers to Clinton’s advantage as “the woman’s card” (with an apostrophe and “s” on “woman” to indicate possession). In comparison, when Clinton responded to his comments, she referred to “the woman card” (no possessive marker). And this difference doesn’t stop at Trump and Clinton. Even different media outlets are divided: NPR and The Boston Globe refer to “the woman’s card” in their articles whereas TIME and the BBC refer to “the woman card.” So which one’s correct?

Let’s think about what playing “the woman(’s) card” really means. When people play “the woman(’s) card,” it means that they’re appealing to sexist or anti-sexist attitudes to gain some sort of advantage. For example, Trump may believe that Clinton is using “the woman(’s) card” because she’s pledging to fight for gender equality while in office and she’s positioning herself as the first female US president.

If we understand “the woman(’s) card” to be an advantage that comes from focusing on issues related to women, “the woman card” seems like the right term. After all, it suggests that we’re referring to a “card” related to women. It also takes the same format as “the race card,” a similar term that may be more familiar to many of you.

“The woman’s card,” on the other hand, seems to refer to a “card” that belongs to a woman, which isn’t really what “the woman(’s) card” gets at. After all, people don’t have to be women to use the “woman card.” We also don’t hear people talk about “the race’s card.”

In the end, then, Clinton takes the win for using the correct term. This may not be a surprise to many of you given that Trump hasn’t had the best track record as far as grammar and language use go. In his defense, though, idioms are tricky, even for native English speakers. We’ve all had times when we’ve had to look one up to make sure that we’re using it correctly, and maybe next time Trump will too.

Have any lingering thoughts about the difference between “the woman’s card” and “the woman card”? Leave us a note in our comments section below.

Need to make a good impression with your website copy, grant proposal, or admissions essay? We can help. Get an instant quote here.

Inpression Editing | Online editing, copywriting, and coaching | www.inpression.io